New York
Corporate Soccer League
Lawyers Soccer League
Standings
Through March 20 |
Note: If there are any discrepancies
with your team's record or point total, please e-mail the League office immediately. Standings Standings through:
|
Advocates |
| TEAM |
W |
|
L |
|
T |
Points |
| Alliance Bernstein |
6 |
- |
1 |
- |
1 |
19 |
| Kelly Drye |
5 |
- |
2 |
- |
1 |
16 |
| Baruch F.C. |
5 |
- |
2 |
- |
1 |
16 |
| Cravath |
5 |
- |
2 |
- |
1 |
16 |
| Deutsche Bank |
5 |
- |
2 |
- |
1 |
16 |
| AXA II |
5 |
- |
3 |
- |
0 |
15 |
| PMG |
5 |
- |
3 |
- |
0 |
15 |
| Google I |
4 |
- |
3 |
- |
1 |
13 |
| NY Presbyterian I |
3 |
- |
5 |
- |
0 |
9 |
| Fitzpatrick |
2 |
- |
5 |
- |
1 |
7 |
| Compass SIF |
2 |
- |
6 |
- |
0 |
6 |
| Patterson |
1 |
- |
7 |
- |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Barristers |
| TEAM |
W |
|
L |
|
T |
Points |
| Cosentini |
9 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
27 |
| Latham & Watkins |
7 |
- |
2 |
- |
0 |
21 |
| Barclays Capital |
7 |
- |
2 |
- |
0 |
21 |
| Google II |
7 |
- |
2 |
- |
0 |
21 |
| Gibson Dunn |
5 |
- |
3 |
- |
1 |
16 |
| Barclays |
5 |
- |
4 |
- |
0 |
15 |
| RHI |
4 |
- |
5 |
- |
0 |
12 |
| Capital IQ |
3 |
- |
6 |
- |
0 |
9 |
| King's College |
3 |
- |
6 |
- |
0 |
9 |
| Dewey |
2 |
- |
6 |
- |
1 |
7 |
| S&P F.C. |
2 |
- |
7 |
- |
0 |
6 |
| AXA I |
0 |
- |
9 |
- |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Barristers- Coed East |
| TEAM |
W |
|
L |
|
T |
Points |
| FRBNY |
8 |
- |
1 |
- |
0 |
24 |
| NYSE Tec |
8 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
24 |
| Bain |
5 |
- |
2 |
- |
0 |
15 |
| NY Presbyterian II |
5 |
- |
4 |
- |
0 |
13 |
| Kramer Levin |
4 |
- |
4 |
- |
0 |
12 |
| Duval |
4 |
- |
3 |
- |
0 |
12 |
| PWC |
2 |
- |
5 |
- |
1 |
7 |
| Stroock |
2 |
- |
5 |
- |
1 |
7 |
| Dewberry |
2 |
- |
6 |
- |
0 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Barristers- Coed West |
| TEAM |
W |
|
L |
|
T |
Points |
| Merrill Lynch I |
7 |
- |
1 |
- |
0 |
21 |
| Cleary |
5 |
- |
3 |
- |
0 |
15 |
| Colpal |
5 |
- |
3 |
- |
0 |
15 |
| Inqenuity Media |
5 |
- |
3 |
- |
0 |
15 |
| STV II |
3 |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
10 |
| MSG |
3 |
- |
5 |
- |
0 |
9 |
| Hess Corparation |
2 |
- |
5 |
- |
0 |
6 |
| Credit Suisse District 9 |
2 |
- |
6 |
- |
0 |
6 |
| S&P |
1 |
- |
7 |
- |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Counsellors West |
| TEAM |
W |
|
L |
|
T |
Points |
| Clifford |
8 |
- |
1 |
- |
0 |
24 |
| Ropes & Gray |
6 |
- |
0 |
- |
3 |
21 |
| Conductor I |
6 |
- |
3 |
- |
0 |
18 |
| Jones Day |
5 |
- |
4 |
- |
0 |
15 |
| Eurasia II |
4 |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
13 |
| Cahill |
3 |
- |
5 |
|
1 |
10 |
| Kenyon & Kenyon |
2 |
- |
6 |
- |
1 |
7 |
| Google III |
2 |
- |
6 |
- |
1 |
7 |
| PHD |
2 |
- |
7 |
- |
0 |
6 |
| Hogan Lovells |
2 |
- |
7 |
- |
0 |
6 |
| PMP |
2 |
- |
7 |
- |
0 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Counsellors East |
| TEAM |
W |
|
L |
|
T |
Points |
| STV I |
6 |
- |
1 |
- |
1 |
19 |
| DeVito |
6 |
- |
2 |
- |
0 |
18 |
| Eurasia I |
5 |
- |
2 |
- |
1 |
16 |
| Wiley |
5 |
- |
2 |
- |
1 |
16 |
| Lacoste |
5 |
- |
3 |
- |
0 |
15 |
| Protiviti |
4 |
- |
3 |
- |
0 |
13 |
| Corcoran |
4 |
- |
3 |
- |
1 |
13 |
| ALM |
3 |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
10 |
| Conductor II |
3 |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
9 |
| HLB Bankshots |
3 |
- |
4 |
- |
0 |
9 |
| Loews |
3 |
- |
5 |
- |
0 |
9 |
| Economist |
3 |
- |
5 |
- |
0 |
9 |
| Thumbplay |
1 |
- |
6 |
- |
1 |
4 |
Standings order:
(1) most points (2) winning percentage
(3)
alphabetical order by team name
|
| Each
team is awarded points on the following basis: |
| 3 points |
for a victory |
| 1 point |
for a draw |
| 0 points |
for a loss |
Tie-Breakers For Playoffs:
(1) head to head competition (2) record against common opponent(3)
strength of schedule
|
|
|
- click here for details